Eric Michael Johnson in Scientific American:
Johnson: In addition to your many scientific articles and books you also contribute to blogs. My friends Ed Yong who writes
Not Exactly Rocket Science and Christopher Ryan at
Sex at Dawn have both had the pleasure, as I have myself, of interacting with you through this medium. You also write occasional pieces for
The Huffington Post and
Three Quarks Daily. Why do you think it’s important for prominent scientists to utilize the blogosphere?
De Waal: If you’re a passionate scientist it’s important to communicate your science to people. I personally don’t think that should be left to science writers. I respect a lot of science writers and many of them are very good. But I do feel that the scientists themselves also need to say what they think of their field and what research they find relevant. I also have fun and do it more for amusement sometimes. During the elections, for example, I wrote a piece about
Hilary Clinton and alpha female apes. I think a lot of human politics mirrors primate politics and I like to make those connections. But, at the same time, there’s a serious undertone in communicating to people that what we do is not necessarily so special, it’s not so special that you can’t compare it to what other animals are doing.
没有评论:
发表评论